A Church Needed $900 Before Sunday — Bumpy Johnson Would Not Give Them a Dollar

A Church Needed $900 Before Sunday — Bumpy Johnson Would Not Give Them a Dollar

On the afternoon of October 12, 1939, in Harlem, Bumpy Johnson, a man known throughout the neighborhood as a numbers banker, climbed the stairs of a mortgage brokerage on 125th Street. He was accompanied by a 62-year-old Baptist pastor from West 139th Street, whose church had been making payments on its building for more than a decade. The church faced a Saturday deadline to pay $900 or lose the building to foreclosure. The money from the Sunday collection would come two days too late, so the pastor had turned to Johnson for help.

Thumbnail

But when the brokerage’s principal saw who had come with the pastor, he refused both the money and the man, loudly, in front of a waiting room full of people, declaring that a guarantee from that quarter was not an asset his office could put in a file. Johnson remained silent, did not respond, and left with the pastor. That evening, Johnson asked for the church’s complete mortgage file, every paper it held, going back to the purchase in 1928. The file arrived in a cardboard grocery box, containing deeds, a bond, a mortgage, and 22 extension agreements.

Working through the papers late into the night, Johnson found that the church had taken a $4,000 mortgage in April 1928. Over the following 11 years, it had paid more than that amount in interest, bonuses, drawing fees, and service charges, yet the principal stood at just $3,400. The church had paid $4,190 in bonuses and fees alone, none of which went toward the debt. The fire insurance told a similar story: the church paid $210 a year for coverage that, at the filed rate for its building, should have cost about $96, with the difference secured by the threat of default.

When the church’s trustees came to Johnson on Sunday, asking for the $900 he had not given them two days earlier, he refused. He told them that $900 paid then would be gone by Monday evening, and the same letter would arrive again in April. He said he would not put money into the hands of the man on 125th Street, because every dollar that went there bought the church another six months of the same arrangement, and the office another six months of the same power. The trustees went home believing they had been refused by a man who had chosen his pride over their church.

What Johnson had found was the reason for his refusal, though he did not yet have the proof in a form that could be shown to anyone. He understood that the $900 was not the problem, but a symptom of a larger structure: the brokerage was powerful not because of its principal, but because it was the only office in the city that would lend to a Harlem church. Downtown banks held the deposits of a dozen Harlem congregations but had never written a mortgage on a Harlem church in their history. Johnson began working the following week with paper rather than money.

He instructed his men to ask churches, lodges, and benevolent associations for permission to examine their mortgage papers. He brought in a Harlem attorney who specialized in title searches, a licensed appraiser who agreed to assess the church and other properties, and a small building and loan association that could carry mortgages if it received more deposits. The strategy was explained at a meeting in a church basement. Money was to be moved, not given.

Congregations that held deposits in savings banks that would not lend to them would transfer those deposits to the building and loan association, which would consider their applications. The legal work would proceed on three tracks: the attorney would demand itemized accounts, the insurance broker would file a complaint with the state insurance department, and the title defects found in the papers would be brought to the attention of the title company. The survey ran from late October through the second week of December. Collectors called on the trustees of 41 institutions, and 26 consented in writing to have their papers examined and copied.

The totals when cast were worse than anyone had expected: the 26 institutions held mortgages with a total original principal of $61,200, of which $54,960 was still outstanding. Over periods ranging from four to six years, they had paid $47,315 in bonuses, drawing fees, and charges, none of which had been applied to principal. Not one of the 26 was an amortizing loan. The minister’s council passed a resolution in December recording the facts, calling on savings banks to consider applications on the report of a licensed appraiser, and directing that no member institution settle its own account privately while the matter was pending.

The table of findings appeared in a weekly Harlem newspaper on December 16, and 60 copies were mailed to bank officers, state departments, title companies, and mortgage houses. The brokerage responded within nine days, exactly as the organizers had anticipated. It wrote to four of the 26 institutions offering to convert their loans to three-year terms at a lower rate, with bonuses waived, on condition the offers remain confidential and be accepted by January 8. All four reported the offers to the council in writing, as they had promised, and the letters went into the file as evidence that the practice complained of was not necessary or customary.

In January, the brokerage filed notices of intention to foreclose on three of the smallest institutions, chosen for their weakness. But the attorney had instructed every institution in October to continue tendering interest payments on the day due, by registered mail, and to keep the returned receipts. When the brokerage refused the payments, as it did in all three cases, the payments were deposited with the council’s treasurer, and the refusals were documented. The foreclosure actions were filed, then not pressed.

The demand letters went out in mid-January: 26 requests for itemized statements of account, the identity of the holder of the bond and mortgage, and copies of all recorded instruments. Eleven were answered incompletely. Fifteen were not answered at all. The searches that followed found 13 unrecorded extension agreements, four unrecorded assignments, and two satisfactions of mortgage that had been paid for in 1934 and 1936 but never filed, meaning two institutions had believed themselves in debt for years when they actually owned their buildings outright.

The insurance complaint was filed in January, and by February the agency conceded that certain premiums had been computed on a rating classification that did not correspond to the construction and occupancy of the risks. The title company, acting on its own, declined to certify titles on the affected parcels until the record was cured. The brokerage, which lived by selling its mortgages to a downtown mortgage company that bought only insurable paper, found a substantial number of its instruments could not be certified, sold, or pledged. Through the same weeks, 19 institutions quietly transferred their deposits to the building and loan association, moving $86,400 in new deposits over seven weeks.

Johnson took no share, no certificate, no seat on the board, and no acknowledgment. Threats came in response. Word reached the pastor that a state body could be interested in the affairs of a church that permitted a man of Johnson’s reputation to involve itself in its finances. A deacon was told his employer had been asked questions.

An offer of $400 was made to a trustee to sign a statement that the survey figures for his institution were inaccurate. He declined, reported the offer within the required 48 hours, and provided a written account, which went into the file. The appraisals were delivered in February. Seventeen institutions filed applications with the building and loan association, and six were declined on the ground that their collections would not support amortizing payments.

The declinations were published alongside the approvals, a decision that cost the campaign nothing and bought it the reputation of not overstating its case. The stipulation with the state insurance department was signed on February 20. The agency agreed to rewrite policies at the filed rates, refund $1,842 in excess premiums, and cease the practice of advancing premiums to mortgaged institutions and adding the advances to renewal demands. The request for a conference came by letter in late February, asking that it be held privately.

The council replied that the meeting would be held in the church basement on February 26, attended by the council’s officers, the attorney, the appraiser, and the trustees of any institution that wished to send them. Johnson arrived after the meeting had begun and did not speak once in two hours and ten minutes. He understood that the moment his voice entered the room, the subject would change from a mortgage practice to a man. The agreement was signed on March 14, 1940.

Seventeen mortgages were satisfied and refinanced by the building and loan association on 15-year amortizing terms at 5. 5 percent, with no bonus, no drawing fee, and no charge for search or recording. Nine mortgages remained with the brokerage, which agreed to written three-year extensions at a fixed rate, no bonuses or service charges, recording every extension within 30 days, and accepting fire insurance placed by any licensed broker of the institution’s choosing. All 13 unrecorded extensions and four unrecorded assignments were recorded within 60 days, and the two satisfactions were executed and filed.

The $900 was paid, and it was not paid by Johnson. The congregation on 139th Street raised it themselves between October and February, in envelopes, in Sunday collections, at three suppers and a rally, in amounts from a nickel to $22. The total was $912. 40.

None of it went to a bonus, a drawing fee, or a service charge. It was applied to principal at the closing, reducing the building’s debt from $3,400 to $2,487. 60. It was the largest reduction of principal the church had achieved in the 12 years since the purchase.

The receipt was read aloud in the sanctuary the following Sunday and placed in the church safe. The savings bank that had held the deposits but never written the loans adopted a memorandum of practice in spring 1940, stating that applications on income-producing and institutional properties would be received and considered upon the report of a licensed appraiser, without reference to the location of the property within the city. It wrote its first mortgage on a Harlem church in November 1941 and held 14 such mortgages by the end of 1943. None of its officers ever conceded that the two facts were connected.

The building and loan association, which had held a little over $300,000 in assets in October 1939, held more than $900,000 by 1945 and moved into a ground-floor office with a window on the street. The brokerage on 125th Street continued in business for four more years but never recovered the part that had mattered. Its Harlem mortgage portfolio was refinanced away or converted to fixed terms it could not profit from. The practice of collecting a bonus twice a year from an institution with nowhere else to go had ended in the district, not because it had been prohibited, but because the condition that made it possible had been removed.

Its principal moved his office to Westchester County in 1944. No one from Harlem followed him, wrote about him, or troubled him in any way. The minister’s council kept its mortgage committee as a standing body. Its rule, adopted in 1941 and observed for more than 20 years, was that the trustees of a member institution would read the terms of every mortgage instrument aloud at the January meeting of the congregation, including the fees, and that no officer would sign a renewal or an extension without a second signature and a written statement of the total paid to date.

Congregations that had never known what their own arrangements cost them began to know it. Two more surveys were carried out on the same model in the next eight years, one covering installment furniture contracts and one covering burial insurance. Four of the young men who had done the collecting ended up in businesses of their own. One took a license and sold insurance in the district for 31 years.

The pastor lived until 1958 and preached in the same sanctuary until three months before his death. He told the story from the pulpit twice, both times in the same way, and both times the emphasis fell in a place his congregation did not expect. He did not dwell on the waiting room, the insult, or the man who delivered it. He spoke about the Sunday afternoon when six trustees and their pastor had asked a friend for $900 and been refused, and about how they had gone home believing they had been abandoned, and about the five months it had taken them to understand that they had been handed something they could not have bought.

The building was still theirs in 1958. The mortgage had been discharged in 1953, 13 years after the agreement and 25 years after the purchase. The final payment had been made out of the ordinary collections of an ordinary congregation, without a benefactor of any kind. Nothing was celebrated.

There was no banquet, no plaque, and no presentation. When the council proposed recording a vote of thanks in its minutes naming the man who had organized the survey, he asked that the name be left out. The minutes record a vote of thanks to the trustees, the attorney, the appraiser, and the collectors, and to no one else. His reason was practical rather than modest: a name in a minute book becomes a name in a newspaper, and a newspaper story about a numbers banker who had saved a church would have turned the 26 institutions from a coalition into a following.

He had spent five months building a case that belonged to the community, and he understood that the last thing required of him was to keep his name off it.