Tommy Lascelles Never Trusted Prince Philip — And Everyone Knew It

Tommy Lascelles Never Trusted Prince Philip — And Everyone Knew It

The death of Prince Philip at Windsor Castle on April 9, 2021, at the age of 99 closed a chapter that began in the nervous summer of 1946, when a young naval officer with no fortune and a complicated family tree first asked Princess Elizabeth to marry him.

At the center of the opposition stood Sir Alan Lascelles, universally known as Tommy, private secretary to King George VI and the man who had spent a lifetime learning why royal people making up their own minds could be extremely dangerous.

The problem was never that Philip lacked charm. If anything, that made matters worse. He was tall, athletic, confident, decorated by war, and almost aggressively unimpressed by grandeur.

He had opinions. He expressed them. He did not first inspect the room to determine whether someone important might prefer that he did not have them.

Lascelles had seen what happened when that system failed. Years before Philip arrived with his naval confidence, he had served another glamorous young prince, Edward, Prince of Wales. He had watched Edward perform brilliantly before a crowd and then behave privately as though the responsibilities attached to his position were somebody else’s administrative inconvenience.

By the late 1920s, Lascelles had privately warned Prime Minister Stanley Baldwin that the heir was becoming unfit for the crown. It was an extraordinary judgment for a royal servant to make. Then history performed one of its more vicious little tricks.

Edward became king in January 1936, chose Wallis Simpson, and abdicated in December.

His younger brother Albert became King George VI, and Lascelles was there. The experience marked him permanently. A king had placed his private wishes above the arrangement expected of him and walked away.

His shy younger brother inherited a throne he had never expected to occupy. His ten-year-old niece Elizabeth suddenly became the future queen.

From that moment onward, marriage was never going to be merely marriage for her. Her husband would not simply become the man sitting opposite her at breakfast. He would enter the center of the crown.

His temperament would matter. His family would matter. His ambitions would matter.

His resentments would matter. Even his ability to endure boredom would matter.

Then came Philip. On paper, he was both royal and strangely rootless. Born Prince Philip of Greece and Denmark on Corfu in 1921, his family fled Greece when he was an infant.

His father eventually lived much of his life away from the family. His mother suffered a severe mental health crisis and spent time in psychiatric care.

Philip was passed among schools and relatives, learning very young that homes, countries, and adults could disappear from daily life with impressive efficiency. His four older sisters married German aristocrats, a fact that became especially awkward when Germany fell under Nazi rule.

He joined the Royal Navy and finally found something solid. A ship had rules. Ranks were clear.

Orders mattered. Competence mattered. Engines did not care about dynastic gossip.

The sea did not care whether someone’s grandmother had been a princess. Philip thrived.

During the Second World War, he served in the Mediterranean and the Pacific. This was not ceremonial military service arranged to decorate a royal biography. He served in active wartime conditions and developed the confidence of a man who had been trusted with real responsibility before reaching twenty-five.

Their important meeting had come in 1939 at the Royal Naval College at Dartmouth. Philip was an eighteen-year-old cadet. Elizabeth was thirteen.

He was asked to help entertain the princesses during the visit. Elizabeth was immediately fascinated. They began corresponding.

The war kept them physically apart but changed the meaning of their relationship.

By the end of the war, their connection had survived long enough that the adults around Elizabeth could no longer assume it would evaporate. Lascelles watched the situation develop with the memory of Edward still lodged firmly in his mind. He had learned the hardest possible lesson about attractive princes.

Charm proved nothing. Courage did not automatically produce judgment. Popularity did not guarantee loyalty.

And love, as the abdication had demonstrated, could create problems powerful enough to shake a throne. Philip was not Edward. His naval career suggested discipline, courage, and service.

But Lascelles did not assess only what a man had done. He thought about what a man might do once placed inside the machinery of monarchy.

Philip was proud. He was independent. He had grown accustomed to command.

He possessed no great fortune of his own. His immediate family history was chaotic. His sisters’ German marriages were a political embarrassment in a Britain that had only recently survived six years of war against Germany.

And hovering nearby was Philip’s maternal uncle, Louis Mountbatten. Lord Mountbatten was clever, energetic, glamorous, and ambitious. He adored Philip.

He also understood publicity. The Mountbatten connection made some courtiers uneasy because they suspected that Philip’s marriage might become a vehicle for a family whose appetite for influence was not exactly hidden under a napkin.

Then there was Philip’s manner. The royal household of the 1940s remained intensely hierarchical. Older courtiers had been raised in a world where age, position, and social rank determined how a young man behaved in a room.

Philip had been raised by exile, boarding schools, and the Royal Navy. The resulting styles did not blend naturally.

He was not inclined to flatter. He did not become smaller in the presence of important men. If he disagreed, he might say so.

That could look admirable to Elizabeth and alarming to people whose professional environment depended on everyone understanding when not to say what they were thinking.

By 1946, Elizabeth believed Philip was settled. That summer, he proposed. Elizabeth accepted.

The romantic question was therefore answered before the institutional question had caught up. King George VI did not forbid the marriage, but he wanted time. Elizabeth was still only twenty.

The engagement remained private. Philip was required to wait. The delay offered something more valuable than romance ever could.

Observation. Lascelles could watch the young man. How did Philip behave when he was not immediately given what he wanted?

How would he handle uncertainty?

In early 1947, the King, Queen, Princess Elizabeth, and Princess Margaret left Britain for South Africa. Philip stayed behind. During the tour, Lascelles watched the princess closely.

In South Africa, something changed. The quiet princess began looking less like a protected daughter and more like a future sovereign.

Then came her twenty-first birthday. From Cape Town, Elizabeth broadcast a promise that would define her life. She declared that her whole life, whether long or short, would be devoted to service.

For Lascelles, who had once watched a future king treat duty as an inconvenience, the contrast could hardly have been sharper.

When Elizabeth returned to Britain in May 1947, Philip was still waiting and Tommy Lascelles was still watching. Waiting had not changed Elizabeth’s mind. If anything, the South African tour had made the situation more difficult for anyone hoping that time would cool the romance.

Philip therefore began the strange process of making himself acceptable to the British monarchy, despite having been born a prince. Before the engagement became public, he renounced his Greek and Danish royal titles. He became a naturalized British subject.

He adopted the surname Mountbatten. Prince Philip became Lieutenant Philip Mountbatten.

It was a remarkable transformation. He had spent much of his childhood losing homes. Now to marry Elizabeth, he voluntarily surrendered the identity into which he had been born.

The monarchy did not merely ask whether he loved Elizabeth. It asked whether he was prepared to be reshaped around her destiny.

The engagement was publicly announced on July 9, 1947. Britain reacted with enormous interest. After years of war, death, destruction, and austerity, a royal wedding promised something cheerful.

Elizabeth saved clothing ration coupons for her wedding dress. Women around the country reportedly tried to send her some of their own.

Philip’s sisters were not invited to the wedding. The reason was painfully obvious. All four had married Germans in 1947.

Inviting German relatives with controversial wartime associations into Westminster Abbey for the wedding of Britain’s future queen would have created political and public difficulties. For Philip, it was personal. For the palace, it was necessary.

On November 19, 1947, Philip was made Duke of Edinburgh, Earl of Merioneth, and Baron Greenwich. He was also granted the style of Royal Highness. The following morning, he married Princess Elizabeth at Westminster Abbey.

For millions of people, it was a bright moment after a dark decade.

At first, they were allowed something close to ordinary married life. Philip returned to his naval career. This mattered enormously to him.

In 1948, their first child was born. Charles arrived on November 14. Then Philip was posted to Malta.

It became one of the most important chapters of their marriage precisely because it looked so ordinary by royal standards.

Elizabeth spent extended periods with him on the island. There, away from Buckingham Palace, she could live something approaching the life of a naval officer’s wife. Philip had work that belonged to him.

He wore naval uniform because he had earned his rank. He had a command. He gave orders.

These Malta years showed what Philip’s preferred marriage might have looked like. The problem was that the future was getting closer. King George VI’s health was weakening.

Years of heavy smoking had taken a serious toll. Their second child, Anne, was born in August 1950.

In September 1951, surgeons operated on the King and removed his left lung after discovering a malignant tumor. Elizabeth would have to take on more duties. Philip would have to accompany her.

His naval career was effectively being overtaken by events.

For Philip, this was a profound personal loss. He had reached the rank of lieutenant commander. He had commanded Magpie.

His prospects were good. The navy was not a hobby he could cheerfully place in a cupboard. It was the career through which he had built himself.

Now his wife’s destiny was ending it.

Philip took leave from active naval service in 1951. He was not yet thirty. The future he had imagined for himself was finished.

What replaced it was much less clear. In January 1952, Elizabeth and Philip departed on another overseas journey on the King’s behalf.

At London airport, the King came to see them off. He looked thin and ill. Elizabeth kissed her father goodbye.

Philip stood nearby. Lascelles remained in Britain. The young couple flew south.

In Kenya, they stayed first at Sagana Lodge and then traveled to Treetops.

Far away in Norfolk during the early hours of February 6, 1952, King George VI died in his sleep. Before Elizabeth was formally told, Philip learned that the King was dead. He took his wife away from the others.

Then he told her. Elizabeth was twenty-five years old.

When their aircraft returned to London, a group of senior figures waited to receive the new Queen. Among them was Tommy Lascelles. There was Winston Churchill, the prime minister.

Elizabeth stepped from the aircraft dressed in morning black. The young woman who had flown out as Princess Elizabeth returned as Queen Elizabeth II.

Philip walked with her, but already the arrangement had changed. He was her husband. He was also her subject.

For a man who had spent his life escaping uncertain identities, the new one was not immediately comfortable. He was thirty years old. He had energy, intelligence, confidence, and absolutely no established job.

The first major collision came over something that sounded almost trivial, the family name. It was not trivial to Philip. When he married Elizabeth, he had abandoned his Greek and Danish titles and taken the surname Mountbatten.

Now it seemed obvious to Philip and especially to Lord Mountbatten that their descendants might carry the Mountbatten name.

At a dinner, Mountbatten was reported to have boasted that the House of Mountbatten now reigned. The remark reached Queen Mary. She was eighty-four.

She did not consider the House of Windsor available for casual replacement because Dicky Mountbatten was pleased with himself at dinner.

The matter reached the government. Churchill also opposed changing the royal house from Windsor. The question was put before the Queen.

Elizabeth eventually declared that she and her children would continue to be known as the House and Family of Windsor. For the institution, the matter was settled. For Philip, it was a humiliation.

He reportedly described himself as the only man in the country unable to give his name to his children. The complaint was technically exaggerated. Royal families have never been famous for operating like ordinary families.

Emotionally, however, it 𝓮𝔁𝓹𝓸𝓼𝓮𝓭 exactly what Lascelles had feared. Philip felt diminished. Lascelles saw safeguards.

Even the question of where they lived became complicated. Philip had enjoyed Clarence House. The institution expected the monarch to operate from Buckingham Palace.

Again, tradition won. Again, Philip moved. This pattern could easily have turned him into a permanently resentful man.

Instead, he began searching for territory where he could exert real influence.

Philip was given an important role in the preparations for the coronation and served as chairman of the coronation commission. One of the great arguments concerned television. Churchill himself initially had reservations about television coverage.

Philip saw the other side. Elizabeth ultimately supported broad television coverage.

On June 2, 1953, Elizabeth entered Westminster Abbey to be crowned. Then came the homage. The Duke of Edinburgh approached the Queen, the former naval officer who had once commanded his own ship, and knelt before his wife.

Before the assembled abbey and the millions watching beyond it, Philip pledged himself as her liege man of life and limb.

Lascelles retired from the Queen’s service in the summer of 1953, but retirement did not mean that Philip had suddenly escaped the world Tommy represented. Sir Michael Adeane succeeded him as the Queen’s private secretary and inherited an office shaped by the same principles.

Philip responded by making himself busy. He threw himself into public engagements. He visited factories, laboratories, schools, and sporting organizations.

He became interested in engineering, industrial design, conservation, and scientific research. In 1956, the Duke of Edinburgh’s Award was launched.

In 1957, Philip returned from a long journey. Almost immediately, Buckingham Palace made an important announcement. Philip would henceforth be known as Prince Philip.

The title did not give him constitutional power. It did give recognition. That distinction mattered.

In 1960, Elizabeth gave birth to their third child, Prince Andrew. Elizabeth now made a compromise that would have been difficult to imagine during the nervous first months of her reign. The royal house would remain Windsor, but descendants of Elizabeth and Philip who needed a surname could use Mountbatten-Windsor.

Philip had waited eight years for those few extra syllables. For an outsider, the dispute might seem absurd. But Philip had spent his childhood being moved between countries, relatives, and schools.

The name Mountbatten was one of the few pieces of personal identity he had deliberately chosen.

In 1961, Philip became the first president of the British branch of the World Wildlife Fund. In 1964, Elizabeth gave birth to their fourth child, Prince Edward. The marriage had survived the violent adjustment of accession.

Philip was no longer struggling each morning to understand what he was supposed to do.

In October 1966, disaster struck the Welsh mining village of Aberfan. A colliery spoil tip collapsed and buried part of the village including Pantglas Junior School. One hundred forty-four people were killed, most of them children.

Philip traveled to Aberfan the following day.

The documentary Royal Family was broadcast in 1969. The audience was enormous. For viewers accustomed to formal photographs and ceremonial appearances, the effect was startling.

The Queen could be seen behaving like a mother. Philip could be seen as a husband and father. The walls had opened.

On July 1, 1969, the ceremony took place at Caernarfon Castle. Elizabeth formally invested her son with the symbols of his position. Philip watched another generation move deeper into royal duty.

The boy he had tried to harden was becoming a public figure in his own right.

In 1973, Camilla married Andrew Parker Bowles. Charles was devastated. The episode became one of the emotional turning points in his private life.

Philip’s reaction was shaped by his own experience. He believed that Charles needed to stop drifting. Father and son remained opposites in this respect.

In 1976, photographs of Princess Margaret and Roddy Llewellyn together became public. The 𝒔𝒄𝒂𝓃𝒹𝒶𝓁 was immediate. Margaret and Snowdon formally separated in 1978.

They divorced. It was the first divorce of a senior member of the immediate royal family since the early years of the century.

In February 1981, the engagement of Charles and Diana was announced. Then a reporter asked whether they were in love. Diana answered immediately.

Of course. Charles added the now famous qualification. Whatever in love means.

On July 29, 1981, Charles and Diana married at St. Paul’s Cathedral.

In June 1982, Prince William was born. Prince Harry followed in September 1984. For Elizabeth and Philip, the arrival of grandsons was deeply important.

Yet Philip’s relationship with Diana became complicated. He understood what it meant to enter the royal family as an outsider. But their personalities differed.

In April 1987, Tommy Lascelles died at the age of ninety-nine. He had lived long enough to see Elizabeth become one of the world’s most experienced monarchs. He had lived long enough to see the prince he once regarded with such caution become the Queen’s longest serving companion in everything but title.

The year 1992 became the breaking point. Princess Anne’s marriage ended in divorce. Prince Andrew separated from Sarah.

Charles and Diana were moving toward formal separation. Then Windsor Castle caught fire on November 20, 1992. Four days later, Elizabeth described 1992 as an annus horribilis, a horrible year.

Philip exchanged a series of private letters with Diana. He told Diana in substance that he was willing to help her and Charles if they could still rescue the marriage. He questioned Charles’s conduct.

He did not simply blame Diana. That mattered.

In 1995, Diana gave her famous interview to the BBC program Panorama. Soon afterward, Elizabeth wrote to both Charles and Diana urging them to divorce. The divorce became final in August 1996.

Diana lost the style of royal highness, though she remained Diana, Princess of Wales.

Then in the early hours of August 31, 1997, Diana was killed in a car crash in Paris. She was thirty-six. Elizabeth and Philip were at Balmoral with William and Harry.

William was fifteen, Harry was twelve. Their mother was dead.

Philip played a significant role in the days that followed. Harry later recalled that Philip offered to walk if the boys walked. So he walked beside them.

Philip, now seventy-six, moved through the streets beside his grandsons while enormous crowds watched.

In November 1997, only months after Diana’s death, Elizabeth and Philip marked their fiftieth wedding anniversary. The Queen publicly paid tribute to him. She described Philip as someone who did not take easily to compliments but who had been quite simply her strength and stay.

In 2011, as Philip approached ninety, the Queen gave him the title Lord High Admiral, a deeply meaningful honor for the former naval officer whose active career had been cut short by her accession. In 2017, Philip retired from regular solo public engagements. He was ninety-six.

Philip died at Windsor Castle on April 9, 2021. He was ninety-nine years old. The funeral took place during coronavirus restrictions.

The Queen sat alone in St. George’s Chapel. The image became one of the most powerful of her reign.

Elizabeth died the following year on September 8, 2022, at Balmoral. She was ninety-six. Her reign had lasted more than seventy years.

The young princess Tommy Lascelles had once tried to protect had become the longest reigning monarch in British history, and the husband Tommy never fully trusted had been beside her for almost all of it.

Lascelles had been right about the danger surrounding royal marriage. He had seen Edward choose private desire over duty and bring down a reign. The decades after his retirement proved him right again and again.

But Philip represented the other possibility. He was difficult enough to worry the palace and loyal enough to confound its fears.

Tommy Lascelles had wanted a husband who would understand that Elizabeth came first. Philip spent years fighting the consequences of exactly that arrangement. Then he spent the rest of his life honoring it.

Perhaps that was why the distrust between them mattered.

Lascelles saw the threat of a proud man standing too close to the throne. Philip saw the threat of becoming nobody because his wife occupied it. Neither man surrendered his basic view.

The solution came from Elizabeth. She allowed Philip enough room to remain himself without allowing him to become something the constitution did not permit.

It was not always graceful. There were arguments. There were humiliations.

There were courtiers who disliked him and relatives who irritated everyone. There were mistakes, blunt remarks, family failures, and decisions later regretted. But there was also endurance.

When Philip first asked to marry Elizabeth, Tommy Lascelles had every reason to be cautious. He knew how much damage one charming prince could do. What he could not know was that this particular prince would spend the next seven decades proving that stubbornness could serve duty as powerfully as obedience, provided the stubborn man finally decided what he was stubbornly loyal to.

For Philip, the answer was Elizabeth. And in the end, everyone knew that, too.