What the Ojibwe Told Frances Densmore About the Hairy Ones — Documented in the 1900s

What the Ojibwe Told Frances Densmore About the Hairy Ones — Documented in the 1900s

In the summer of 1907, Frances Densmore stepped off a train in northern Minnesota carrying a portable phonograph, a machine most people had never seen. She was a trained musician from Red Wing, Minnesota, working for the Smithsonian’s Bureau of American Ethnology. Her mission was to record the songs of the Ojibwe before the government of the era assumed those songs would vanish forever. Over the next three decades, she traveled to reservations like White Earth, Red Lake, and Leech Lake, hauling fragile wax cylinders across rough country.

Thumbnail

She sat with elders for hours, recording not just the notes but the meaning, occasion, and story behind each song. Her work produced two thick government volumes under the title “Chippewa Music,” containing hundreds of transcribed songs. What she did not expect, however, was to be told repeatedly about the ones who came before. Elders spoke of tall, hairy beings who had lived on the land long before any European arrival.

They described them not as spirits or monsters, but as people—a different kind of people who had been there first, who had built and shaped the land, and who had since withdrawn or disappeared. The descriptions were consistent across separate communities that had little contact with one another. The hairy ones were said to be enormous, some accounts putting them at twice a man’s height. They were covered in hair, immensely strong, and capable of moving stone and timber that ordinary men could not shift.

Some accounts described them as gentle and shy, keeping to deep woods and high ridges. Others described them as builders of mounds, markers, and old structures whose purpose had been forgotten. The stories carried a practical, matter-of-fact tone. They included details about tracks far larger than any bear’s, spaced by a stride no person could match.

There were places people did not go because those places were understood to still belong to these beings. There were rules: do not mock them, do not follow them, do not take what is theirs. Densmore recorded all of this literally, without editorializing. She noted it the same way she noted the tuning of a drum.

The distinction mattered: these beings were not placed in the same category as spirits and powers in the tradition. They were spoken of as beings of flesh who ate and slept and left tracks, as something once as real as a moose or a passing stranger. These accounts point toward a larger pattern in the landscape. Across the Ohio and Mississippi valleys stood earthworks of staggering scale—animal-shaped mounds a quarter of a mile long, geometric enclosures aligned to the sun and moon, and ramparts that required the coordinated labor of enormous populations.

When European settlers encountered these works, they refused to believe the ancestors of the living native nations could have built them. They invented a vanished race of master builders to take the credit and used that invention to justify taking the land. Evidence in the ground supports a connected ancient world. Copper from the Great Lakes appears in graves far to the south, and shells from distant coasts appear far inland.

Materials moved thousands of miles along routes that were already ancient when the mounds were raised. At some point, much of this system came apart. The great centers were abandoned, the networks thinned, and knowledge of who built what decayed into fragments held in song. Densmore was not the only one to hear these accounts.

Across the same era, collectors, travelers, and missionaries sitting with native nations from coast to coast came home carrying versions of the same story: traditions of tall, hair-covered people who kept to the mountains, of builders and first dwellers who shaped the land and then departed. These collectors did not coordinate. Some recorded the stories only to dismiss them in the same breath, but the paragraphs remain scattered through archives of the 19th and early 20th centuries. In recent years, a loose community of researchers has pointed to the recurring sense that the world we were handed is built on top of something older and greater that was lost.

Some call this vanished order Tartaria. Many specific claims in that movement deserve scrutiny, but underneath lies a persistent intuition that there was a world before this one with reach and knowledge we no longer have. The honest skeptic has counterarguments. Every culture tells stories of giants, and folklore is full of hairy wild men.

Memory is unreliable across many generations, and translation distorts. These points have weight and should not be dismissed. But they struggle to explain the specificity that keeps repeating—the height, the hair, the strength, the building, the sense of a people who came first and withdrew. They struggle to explain why the traditions land on the same profile rather than the endless variety expected from pure invention.

A world can be forgotten in a startlingly short time. It does not take 10,000 years; it takes a few hard generations. The boarding schools that separated children from grandparents, banning language and ceremony, were a machine for producing exactly that kind of forgetting. If a modern nation could come within a single generation of erasing a living memory on purpose, then a catastrophe in the deep past could have done the same to the world the hairy ones belonged to.

The most important knowledge for the Ojibwe was never written down at all. It was carried in song and story because those forms survive what paper and stone cannot. When elders sang into Densmore’s machine, some may have understood exactly what they were doing: placing their memory into a new kind of vessel at the very moment their old vessels were being taken from them by force. Woven into that music were references to the ones who came before, not as fairy tales but as history.

The cylinders themselves survived against long odds. Thousands made their way into national collections, where for decades they were too fragile to play. Only recently has technology allowed those voices to be heard cleanly again. Most of what comes off the wax is music, but the notebooks that traveled alongside the sound contain the rest—the asides, the origins, the stories that framed the songs.

It is there, in the written margin rather than on the cylinder, that the hairy ones live on. It would be dishonest to claim we know what the hairy ones were. The record is a record of testimony, not of dated bone and carved stone. Densmore did not bring back a body or a photograph.

She brought back the memory of people who had no reason to lie to her, spoken in a language she took care to translate faithfully at a moment when their entire world was being dismantled. Frances Densmore died in 1957 in the same corner of Minnesota where she had begun. She left behind thousands of recordings that scholars still work through today—the music, the ceremonies, the language saved from the edge of loss. But in the quiet margins of that work, she left something else: a description repeated by people who did not know one another of tall and hairy builders who had lived here first and had been forgotten by almost everyone but the ones who came after them.

She wrote it down exactly, and trusted that someone, someday, would decide it mattered.