BUMPY JOHNSON ASKED A YOUNG HUSTLER TO NAME THREE PEOPLE ON HIS OWN BLOCK — HE COULDN’T

BUMPY JOHNSON ASKED A YOUNG HUSTLER TO NAME THREE PEOPLE ON HIS OWN BLOCK — HE COULDN'T

On the evening of October 5, 1954, Ellsworth “Bumpy” Johnson, the man Harlem called Bumpy, stood on a corner at Lennox Avenue and West 141st Street and asked a 19-year-old named Lucian Wear to name three people who lived on his own block. Wear, who had lived there since he was six, could not produce a single full name. Johnson told him that a man who cannot name his neighbors does not live on a block—he only stands on it. The question was not a prepared lesson.

Thumbnail

It had grown out of something Johnson had been carrying since the previous Thursday, when a retired letter carrier named Alonzo Ferris came to him with the published register of voters for the Assembly District. Ferris had spent three evenings comparing that book against what he knew from 34 years of carrying mail on the same Harlem route. He found names of people he delivered mail to six days a week missing from the register, names of the dead still listed, and whole rear buildings absent entirely. On his old route alone, he counted 91 households that did not appear in the register at any address.

He had written a letter asking why and received no answer. On Tuesday, October 12, 1954, Johnson went downtown with Ferris, the Reverend Josiah Kemp of Mount Nebo Baptist Church, and attorney Everett Pointer to the county office of the Board of Elections on Broom Street. Ferris asked to see the challenge affidavit filed in his election district since June and requested the reason that 91 households on his route did not appear in the register. Pointer placed a written request on the counter citing the relevant sections of the election law.

The clerk, a heavy man named Harlon Puit who had worked that counter for 11 years, read three lines of the letter, looked up, and fixed his eyes on Johnson. Everyone in the room knew who he was. Puit asked for Johnson’s election district, then the year of his registration, and then pulled a bound roll book from under the counter. In a voice pitched for the room, he said there was no such name in the register for that district, nor in the district south of it.

He added that the office took no complaint and furnished no record to a person who was not himself a registered voter of the district he was complaining about, and that a man with a record like that had no vote to lose and no standing to ask about anybody else’s. He was right about the record. Bumpy Johnson had been convicted of a felony, and his name had been struck from the rolls of the city of New York in 1938 and never restored. In that room, the most widely known man in Harlem was on paper no one at all.

He did not raise his voice. He did not answer the remark about his record, and he did not let Pointer answer it either. He placed two fingers on the lawyer’s sleeve, and Pointer closed his mouth. Johnson asked one question: whether the office would furnish the record to Ferris, who was a registered voter of that district and had been for 31 years.

Puit said the request would have to be in writing, addressed to the commissioners, and that answers took time. Pointer said the request was in writing and was on the counter. Puit said it would be answered in time. Johnson said thank you, put on his hat, and walked out.

On the sidewalk, Pointer was angry and said so. Kemp said they had been made fools of in front of strangers. Johnson said they had not. The clerk had told them the truth about how the office worked, and that was worth the trip.

He rode the subway back uptown and did not talk on the train. He got off at 135th Street and walked the rest of the way in the cold on purpose, because he did not want to arrive anywhere yet. At 142nd Street, he went into the basement of Mount Nebo Baptist Church and sat alone for most of two hours with his hat on the table. Three men came to him in the next four days with offers.

One could get the 91 households looked at as a favor if Johnson would put his name behind a fundraising dinner. One was a printer who wanted to run a front-page attack on the clerk by name. One was a young man who suggested, without saying it plainly, that Harlon Puit could be made to regret the afternoon for very little cost. Johnson turned all three down.

He told the last one that a clerk who was made afraid would still have the same drawer, the same book, and the same rule, and that if you have to break a man to get a piece of paper, the paper is not yours. It is still theirs, and they will want it back. For 11 days he did nothing that anyone could see. What changed was the size of the thing he was looking at.

The clerk had not insulted him out of personal dislike. He had recited a rule, and the rule was the whole matter. The office answered to voters. It measured a person’s right to ask by whether that person’s name appeared on a card in a drawer, and the drawer decided who existed.

If a name could be taken out of that drawer quietly, without a letter, without a reason, without the person learning of it until election day, then the office would have no complaints, because the people with the strongest reason to complain would have already been converted by a stroke of a pen into people with no standing to complain. He started thinking about arithmetic, about carbon paper, about who in Harlem could sign a document and be believed, and about the fact that he himself could not be one of those people. He had no vote. He had a record that any newspaper could print.

Whatever was built would have to stand up without him on any part of it. He decided this in the basement of the church before he had spoken to a single person about a campaign, and he never went back on it. He began in the last week of October to gather people. He asked Alonzo Ferris to be the head of it, because Ferris could reconstruct building by building who lived where, including the rear houses and lettered apartments that the register did not seem to know existed.

He went to Everett Pointer because the campaign would live or die on paper, and Pointer could draw a court proceeding to restore a canceled name. He went to the Reverend Kemp because a church basement is a place where 400 people can come and go without anyone asking their business. He went to Vesta Halloway, the clerk of the church, who would keep the index. He went to Iola Rand, a licensed public school teacher, who could teach a free class and certify what she taught.

He went to Cleopus Barr, who ran a job printing shop, because the campaign would need thousands of printed cards. He went to Wilbur Nance, who edited the Sentinel Advocate, a small Harlem weekly, and asked for something particular: not editorials, not a campaign, but tables—four columns printed plainly, week after week, with the figures and where they came from. He went to a credit union and a benevolent association for money for filing fees, carfare, postage, photostat charges, and a fund to make up a day’s lost wages for a working person who had to take a morning off to sit in a hearing room. In the second week of November, he sent word to Lucian Wear to come and see him.

The young man came expecting a warning or an offer. Johnson told him there was a job that paid $12 a week and no more, that it was legal, and that it consisted of walking his own block and the two blocks either side of it with a stack of printed cards, finding out the name of every person who lived there, their apartment, how long they had lived at that address, and whether they were registered. Wear asked why him. Johnson said because he had been standing on that corner for two years and had learned nothing that could be written down, and it was time he learned something that could.

The strategy was laid out on the folding table in the church basement on the evening of Sunday, November 21, 1954, in front of nine people. Everything began with the count. Until the neighborhood held its own count, kept by its own hands in a form that could be laid beside the official book line for line, every argument would end the same way it had ended on Broom Street, with a clerk saying that the office’s book said otherwise. The canvas was the only way to make the official record answerable to anything.

The cards were printed 4×6 on stiff stock with four ruled columns. The first column took the full name written out, no initials. The second took the address in a fixed form Ferris had designed, so that a rear building was written as a rear building, a lettered apartment as a letter, and a floor as a floor. The third took the date the person had come to that address and the year of registration, if any.

The fourth was left for the status shown in the published register, to be filled in later from the book in a different color of ink. Every card was to be signed at the bottom by the person themselves, or, if they could not write, by a witness who put down his own address. Nothing was to be filled in from memory. The second layer was the law.

Pointer explained that a court proceeding under the election law could not be ignored. If a single canceled voter with a clean record of residence brought a proceeding to be restored to the register, the office would be required to come into court and say on paper on what ground the name had been struck and who had struck it. One such answer would be a curiosity. Forty would be a system laid open.

The third layer was money, defensive rather than aggressive. There would be no boycott of any store and no threat to any man’s business, because a campaign about the right to vote could not afford to look like a campaign about anything else. Johnson put in a sum himself through the association on the condition that his name appear on no receipt, no check, no letterhead, and no list. The fourth layer was social.

The office and the club would at some point offer to fix individual cases, so every household that joined would sign a pledge in ink that they would accept no private restoration of their own name and no job and no favor until a written rule had been adopted for everyone. The signed pledges would be kept in the safe at Mount Nebo, and no copy would be kept anywhere else. The fifth layer was comparison, requiring no accusation at all. Another assembly district in another part of the borough with almost the same number of election districts and a larger population had 11 places to register while Harlem’s district had three.

Its published cancellations for the same period were a fraction of Harlem’s. The two sets of figures printed side by side in four columns in the Sentinel Advocate, with the source of each figure given, would do the work of a hundred speeches in a form that a commissioner downtown could not argue with because they were his own numbers. Johnson added two rules of his own. Nothing that could not be proved with a document would ever be said out loud or printed, and no one connected to the campaign was to say a hard word about Harlon Puit in public or in private, because the man was a clerk following a practice, and the practice was the target.

The work began on Monday, November 29, 1954, and it went on for ten months. Sixty-one people carried cards, and most of them were women, and most of them worked, and they canvassed in the evenings between six and nine and on Saturday afternoons. They worked in pairs and never entered an apartment. Ferris sat three nights a week at the folding table and checked every card that came in against his own knowledge of the route.

Vesta Halloway filed them in steel drawers by street, then by house number, then by floor. By the first of March, they had 2,317 households. Lucian Wear canvassed the three blocks around the corner where he had stood in October. He was bad at it for the first two weeks, because people knew what he was.

Twice he came back to the basement and put his cards down and said he was finished. Ferris made him go out with an older woman named Desa Prior and carry her cards for her. After that he did better, because he watched how she began. She never said the word registration at the door.

She said her name and the name of the church and asked how long the family had lived in the building, and by the second question people were talking. In February, Wear went back to 561 and learned that the old woman on the fourth floor who fed cats was named Cordelia Meechum, that she was 78, that she had come from Norfolk, Virginia in 1911, and that she had voted in every election since 1922 and had been turned away at the polls in November because her name was not in the book. The second stream of work was the copying. Pointer bought a copy of the printed register, and four people working in shifts at the folding table with rulers and pencils copied every name in the 41 election districts of the district onto sheets in the fixed address form, so that the register could be laid beside the card index and read line by line.

It took from December to the middle of February. The third stream was the address list. Ferris and two other retired carriers walked all 19 blocks and wrote down every building, every rear house, every separate entrance, and every lettered apartment, and had the list certified by a licensed surveyor’s clerk who charged them $40. That list showed 164 dwellings in the 19 blocks that did not appear in the board’s address file in any recognizable form.

Families in those buildings had been mailed confirmation cards addressed to street numbers that did not exist. The cards had come back to the office marked undeliverable, and the names had been cancelled as though the people had moved away. They had not moved away. They had never been correctly written down.

The fourth stream was the class. Iola Rand held it on Tuesday and Thursday evenings and Saturday mornings in the church basement, free, and she kept a bound attendance log with the date, the hours, and the material covered, signed by her under her license number. Ninety-four people came through it between January and June. She also found that a person who had completed the sixth grade in an approved school was entitled to register on that certificate without any examination at all, and that dozens of people in the district had been told otherwise.

She wrote to 11 southern school districts for records on behalf of applicants and got 41 certificates back by June. The affidavit files came to light in January. A challenge to a registered voter had to be sworn to, and the sworn statements were filed. Pointer, as an attorney appearing for a named voter, was entitled to inspect the file relating to that voter.

He went down on the 9th of January with the name of one woman and asked to see the papers in her case. He was shown them and copied them by hand, because he was not permitted to remove them. He went back the following week with another name, and the week after that with two more. Over 11 weeks he saw 68 files.

Of the 68, 61 were sworn to by four men, all captains of the same political club in the district. The statements were identical in wording, printed forms with blanks filled in, each swearing that the affiant knew of his own knowledge that the voter no longer resided at the address given. In one, a captain swore that a family had moved out of an apartment in which they had lived since 1937, and in which they were still living when Pointer copied the affidavit. Not one of the 68 had produced a letter to the voter.

Hessie Bramarlet was chosen in February to bring the case, because she was unanswerable. She was 71 years old. She had lived in the same three rooms on West 139th Street since 1929. She had registered in 1923 and had voted in every general election but one, when she had been in the hospital.

She had a rent receipt book going back 19 years, a paid-up burial policy with the same address on it since 1931, a letter from the school where she had cooked for 26 years, and a church membership record in Vesta Halloway’s hand. She had gone to vote in November 1954 and had been told at the table that her name was not in the book, and she had walked home and sat down and had not told anyone for three weeks because she was ashamed. Pointer filed the proceeding on February 14, 1955, in her name alone. Bumpy Johnson’s name appeared nowhere in it.

The petition asked for one thing beyond her restoration: that the office state the ground of the cancellation and produce the affidavit on which it had acted. The answer came back on March 3. It said the name had been cancelled on a challenge affidavit sworn by a named man on August 19, 1954, and it attached the affidavit. That was the first written ground the office had ever furnished to anybody in that district.

The court restored Hessie Bramarlet to the register on March 21, 1955, and in restoring her, the judge observed from the bench that the office had furnished no evidence of any notice to her. Two weeks later, the Sentinel Advocate began printing the tables, and it printed one every week from April 7 to the middle of September. They were plain, four columns: election district, names on the register in June 1954, names cancelled between June and October 1954, names restored. Under each table in small type was the source of every figure, with the page of the published register or the date of the file inspected.

Beside the Harlem district’s figures in the same table were the figures for the comparison district taken from the board’s own published returns. The Harlem district had cancelled 1,146 names out of 9,340. The comparison district, with more voters, had cancelled 96. The pressure that came back arrived in the ordinary shapes.

A man from the club came to the church in April and told Kemp there was concern about the use of a house of worship for political purposes and that the matter might reach the tax people. Kemp answered that the basement had held a free class taught by a licensed teacher and a Saturday desk where citizens filled out their own forms, that the attendance logs were bound and signed, and that the door was open to anyone from any party who wanted to sit in the back and watch. Nobody sat in it. Inspectors came to the church basement on the 20th of April, three of them, on three separate complaints filed the same week, and wrote up the wiring, the stair, and the exit sign.

Pointer had the violations corrected inside 11 days. What he also did was go to the department and copy the inspection history of that building for five years and print it. The building had been inspected twice in five years before that April, and three times in one week after. The table ran in the Sentinel Advocate on April 28 with the dates.

A summons was issued in May against Iola Rand for operating an unlicensed private school. It was withdrawn in 11 days, because she produced her teaching license, her bound logs, and the fact that not one person had ever paid a cent, and because Pointer had already written to the department asking on what section the summons rested. Two canvassers lost their jobs in June in the same week. The wage fund paid them for 11 weeks between them, and both were working again by August, one of them in a job the credit union had found through a member.

The offers came in July. A club official reached Ferris and proposed that 40 names be restored at once, quietly, as a gesture of goodwill, the 40 to be chosen by the club. Ferris said the answer was in the safe at the church and read him the pledge over the telephone. A second approach was made to Pointer, offering to settle the Bramarlet case with costs and to restore any 12 additional voters he cared to name.

Pointer said the case was already decided and that his client had no further interest in it except the practice. The third approach was made directly to Bumpy Johnson on the evening of July 26, 1955, in a restaurant on 7th Avenue, by a man who had known him for 20 years. The proposal was that the campaign be wound up before the fall registration, that the 91 households on the Ferris route be entered on the register, that a place be found for a man of his choosing in the district organization, and that certain other matters that had nothing to do with voting be looked upon with a friendly eye. Johnson had asked two men to eat with him at that table that evening without telling them why: the Reverend Kemp and Wilbur Nance, the editor.

He let the offer be made in front of both of them, and then said no to all of it in about a dozen words, and then said the part that mattered: that the 91 households were not his to trade, that a favor granted could be withdrawn, and that he wanted a rule in writing in the office’s own hand that would still be there when everybody at that table was dead. The man left before the food came. The attempt to break the campaign through Johnson himself came on August 11, 1955, when a downtown paper ran 11 paragraphs suggesting that a voting campaign in Harlem was being financed and directed by a man with a long criminal record, naming him. It failed for one reason.

The reporter had gone looking for documents, and there were none. His name was on no petition, no letterhead, no bank account, no lease, no pledge card, no filing, no receipt, and no minute except the association’s resolution that his name was to appear on nothing. Two days later, the Sentinel Advocate ran the week’s table as usual and printed underneath it a single line noting that any person who wished to examine the campaign’s records could do so at the church on Saturday between 10 and 1. Nine people came in three weeks.

Two of them were from downtown newspapers. By the end of August, the thing had a weight that could no longer be moved by pressure, because it had stopped being a group of people and had become a body of records. The card index held 2,317 households, each signed. The address list was certified.

Sixty-eight affidavit files had been copied by hand by an officer of the court. A judge had put on the record that the office had furnished no evidence of notice. Nineteen weeks of tables had been published with sources. Four hundred and two households had signed the pledge, and it was in a safe.

On September 2, 1955, at the request of a state officer who had been receiving the tables by mail every week since April, a conference was arranged. Before it was held, the campaign took its own vote in the basement on the evening of September 9, because an offer had come in again, larger this time: 340 restorations immediately before the fall registration, with no rule and nothing in writing. Ferris read the offer out. Pointer explained exactly what it meant: that 340 families would get back what was already theirs, and every family that came after them would have to start over.

The vote was 402 to 7 against accepting. The conference took place on September 20, 1955, in a room downtown, and it lasted a little under four hours. Alonzo Ferris sat at the middle of the table. Everett Pointer sat at his right with the affidavit copies, the certified address list, and the court order.

Iola Rand brought the school certificates and the logs. Vesta Halloway brought four steel drawers of cards on a hand truck and did not open them until she was asked. When she was asked, she found in under a minute the card for a name the office named at random, and then the register line that contradicted it. The Reverend Kemp said very little.

Bumpy Johnson was not in the building. He was in the church basement four miles north, and he had asked that no one telephone him during the conference, and no one did. The memorandum of practice was signed on September 30, 1955. It ran to six paragraphs and was posted afterward in the district office and in the three registration places.

No name was to be cancelled from the register without a written notice mailed to the voter at the address on file in a form printed for the purpose, stating the ground of the proposed cancellation and the section relied on, and allowing 15 days for an answer in writing or in person. A challenge affidavit was to state the facts on which the affiant’s personal knowledge rested, was to be numbered and filed in a bound book open to inspection by any voter of the district, and the name of the person who swore it was to be furnished on request to the voter challenged. The address file of the district was to be corrected from a certified list of dwellings, including rear buildings, separate entrances, and lettered apartments. No name was to be cancelled solely because a confirmation card had been returned undeliverable where the fault lay in the address as written by the office.

An examiner was to be present at the district office three days a week during the month of registration. A certificate of completion of the sixth grade in an approved school was to be accepted without examination. A person not passed was to be given the reason in writing and a date for re-examination within five days. The number of registration places in the district was to be increased from three to seven, with Saturday hours, and the locations were to be published in a newspaper of general circulation in the district and posted 14 days in advance.

The monthly district figures of registrations, cancellations, challenges filed, and restorations were to be furnished to any person applying for them in writing within 10 days, without inquiry into the standing of the applicant. Those last 11 words were the ones Bumpy Johnson had asked for in November, and they were the only part of the document he had ever specified. Registration for that year ran from Monday, October 3 to Saturday, October 8, 1955, at seven places instead of three. Written notices went out from the office in the new printed form for the first time in the district’s history.

Four hundred and thirty-one were mailed that autumn, and 209 were answered inside the 15 days, and everyone that was answered was kept on the register. Of the 1,146 names cancelled in 1954, 1,090 were restored before the general election of Tuesday, November 8, 1955. Hessie Bramarlet voted at a school on West 138th Street at eight that morning, and the inspector at the table found her name in the book without difficulty. Cordelia Meechum, who was 78 and had been turned away the year before, was brought down four flights of stairs by two of the canvassers and voted at ten.

The figures for the district over the following year proved that something structural had changed rather than something temporary. Registration in the 41 election districts stood at 9,340 in October 1954. It stood at 14,612 in October 1956. Cancellations, which had run to 1,146 in the year before the memorandum, ran to 84 in the year after it, and of those 84, 79 were deaths or removals verified by a returned notice with the voter’s own answer or a death certificate.

Challenge affidavits filed in the district fell from 231 in 1954 to nine in 1956. The captains who had sworn the affidavits simply stopped swearing them, because the affidavit now had to state how the man knew what he swore, and the bound book was open, and a table would appear in a weekly newspaper with his name in it. In the primary election of 1957, the district leadership changed hands, and the men who took it over had campaigned in part on a promise to keep the office open on Saturdays. The practice spread without any campaign to spread it.

The printed notice form adopted in the memorandum was in use in five other assembly districts by the end of 1957. The line about furnishing figures to any applicant without inquiry into standing turned out to be the one that traveled furthest. It meant that the question Harlon Puit had asked on Broom Street in October 1954—what is your election district and are you in it? —could no longer be used to close a drawer.

Church groups, block associations, and attendance councils in another borough were asking for monthly figures under that clause within 18 months and getting them. Alonzo Ferris kept the index in the four steel drawers in the basement of Mount Nebo Baptist Church, and it was brought up to date every spring by canvassers who by then were doing it out of habit. It was used for things nobody had planned: in 1957 to show a school board how many children of school age lived in 19 blocks, in 1958 by a hospital committee, and twice by families looking for relatives who had come north and lost touch. What had begun as a way to check a government book had become the only accurate description of who lived in that part of Harlem, and it belonged to the people whose names were in it.

Vesta Halloway died in 1961, and the index passed to two younger women who had canvassed in the winter of 1955. Everett Pointer was appointed to a state commission in 1959. Iola Rand’s Saturday class went on for six more years and taught more than 400 people. Bumpy Johnson’s name is not on the memorandum of September 30, 1955.

It is not on the petition filed in February or on the tables printed for 19 weeks or on the pledge in the safe or on the receipt for the $40 paid to certify the address list. He never registered to vote. He never regained the right. He sat in a church basement four miles from the room where the agreement was made, and when Ferris came uptown that evening with the six paragraphs in his coat pocket, Bumpy read them twice, asked one question about the meaning of the last 11 words, and then folded the paper and handed it back, because it was not his.

In September 1957, Lucian Wear was sworn in as an election inspector for the district and sat at a table in a school gymnasium on West 141st Street with the register in front of him. He was 22. He had left the corner two years earlier without ever announcing it, the way a man leaves a habit rather than a place. He was by then one of the people who kept the card index up to date on the three blocks he had canvassed in the winter of 1955, and he could name every household on them, front building and rear, by floor.

Bumpy Johnson walked past that corner many times in the years that followed, and he never asked the question again of him or of anyone else. There was no longer any need to. The answer had been written down 2,317 times in the neighborhood’s own hand and filed where the neighborhood could reach it.